Showing posts with label ITSM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ITSM. Show all posts

Monday, May 25, 2009

Service Desk at Core of ITSM Initiatives

April 23, 2009
By ITSM Watch Staff

Enterprises are achieving cost savings and operational efficiencies through consolidation, process improvement and deployment of more robust technologies.

The help desk has evolved beyond its role of simply recording and responding to IT user issues, according to a new study, The Aging Help Desk: Migrating to a Modern Service Desk, released by Enterprise Management Associates (EMA). Today's help/service desk is at the core of IT service management (ITSM) initiatives.

"EMA has long believed that the service desk represents an area of investment for the enterprise," said Lisa Erickson-Harris, EMA research director and study leader, in a press release. "Our research confirmed that even in this down economy companies view the help/service desk as a place where spending can drive returns through technology automation, the introduction of self-service and consolidation in operations."

Some of the key findings include:

  • Service Desk Part of Overarching ITSM Strategy: Sixty two percent (62%) of participants are either already making the help/service desk part of the company's overarching ITSM solution or are planning to move in this direction.
  • Use of Multiple Help/Service Desk Tools: Fifty six percent (56%) of respondents from large enterprises are managing or planning to manage multiple help desks. The vast majority of organizations managing multiple help/service desks will consolidate their operations.
  • Consolidating Service Desk with Corporate Customer Service: Integrating customer service operations with the IT service desk promises financial savings as both groups require similar training, tool sets, processes and automation capabilities. Thirty percent (30%) of respondents have been able to take advantage of this opportunity.
  • ITIL Disciplines Identified as Important: Sixty four (64%) of respondents have deployed or are planning to deploy ITIL v3. Incident, problem and change management are the most frequently-deployed ITIL disciplines and remain the most critical for help/service desk operations.
  • Service Catalog a Key Growth Area: Fifty six percent (56%) of respondents have already deployed or are planning to deploy a service catalog. Clearly, there is value in putting IT service offerings front and center in the hands of managers and users via the service catalog.
  • Self-Service a Top Priority: Self-service is a strong area of investment because of its ability to lower call volume and resolution time at the service desk. Surprisingly, only 32% of respondents indicated that they had already implemented password reset technology while 41% are planning to do so.

"While the help/service desk has a lot on its plate," Erickson-Harris said. "There are clear opportunities for significant operational cost savings. EMA believes that efforts to expand the footprint of the service desk will also improve the user experience and raise the credibility of IT throughout the organization."

Methodology

For this study, EMA surveyed 158 IT professionals with help/service desk responsibility and familiarity with their organization's ITSM initiatives. This quantitative data was complemented by 14 in-depth telephone interviews. The research examined major initiatives taking place in corporate help/service desk operations and explored topics such as best practices, operational metrics, management priorities and integration needs.

Seven Tips to Rapid Service Transformation

May 15, 2009
By Martin Likier

No ITSM methodology can guarantee success, but there are ways to shorten time to implementation and ensure you get it right the first time, writes ITSM Watch guest columnist Martin Likier of Forsythe.

Once your organization has made the decision to implement an IT service management (ITSM) discipline, you can quickly become overwhelmed.

A litany of books, terms, processes, functions, roles and responsibilities is the first wave that hits you. Then a second wave hits you, which includes communicating with the business, defining services, service level agreements and the gruesome task of trying to develop critical success factors, key performance indicators and operational metrics.

It is enough to make anyone feel like they're drowning, but it doesn't have to be that way. While there is no methodology that can guarantee success, there are seven tips that will shorten your time to implementation, while helping ensure you get it right the first time.

Tip One: Start with a Framework

Frameworks help people avoid reinventing the wheel and overlooking something that will rear its ugly head sooner or later. If you already have a framework in place, you have a choice to make: continue with that framework or choose a new framework. For those who are thinking about choosing a framework path, you may want to consider the following frameworks.

ITIL has become the de facto global standard for IT service management. ITIL provides a set of best practices for managing all phases of the IT service lifecycle. ITIL's best practices encompass services, people, processes and technology, implemented from a life cycle point of view, focused on integration with the business. Because it is public and non-proprietary, it is cost effective and provides the fastest path to making your framework actionable.

Alternatives to ITIL like Microsoft Operations Framework (MOF) do exist but can be based on proprietary or a specific vendor's knowledge which can make them far more difficult to adopt and adapt, and their focus can be either too broad or too narrow. If you are considering an alternative to ITIL, be sure you have determined that it fits your organization’s service management requirements and that you are aware of where gaps may exist between its capabilities and your requirements.

Tip Two: Effective IT Service Management Program is Proactive versus Reactive

Most IT departments spend a great portion of their day operating tactically by reacting and responding to one IT fire after another. Due to this turmoil, reactive organizations generally wait for a directive from the business before they move forward. Proactive organizations are always looking for ways to improve and provide better service. They understand the importance of integrating IT into the business and being viewed as a strategic partner. IT departments that successfully transform into a service oriented culture are able to maintain a proper balance between being proactive versus reactive.

Being extreme in either case can cause problems, but being more proactive helps position IT organizations as true advocates of the business. The business will appreciate you more and value you more highly if they see you being proactive in trying to address and even prevent problems.

Tip Three: Implement Best-Practice Processes and Document Them Properly

Whether it’s a down economy (potentially losing staff) or a thriving economy (potentially gaining staff), it is important for everyone to know what is expected of them and how to accomplish their tasks. Implementing a formalized and documented process model based on best practices will lead to consistent performance of your IT staff day-in, day-out. This holds true whether you are a new hire asked to perform a task on day one or you are a 20-year veteran. Each process should have an identified owner and include role-aligned procedures and tool-aligned work instructions. Using an informal process approach leaves too much to interpretation and runs the risk of not getting it right the first time.

Tip Four: Establish a Governance Committee

Establishing a formal governance (or steering) committee will ensure the continued evolution of an IT service management initiative. Such committees take a holistic view of the entire portfolio of IT programs and recommend and prioritize which improvements should be made and when. Without a formal committee, governance will typically be ad-hoc and driven by silo requests. Ad-hoc governance rarely considers the integration of processes, people and technology to provide improved services to the customer.

Tip Five: You Must Be Able to Explain, Monitor and Evaluate Your IT Processes in Terms of How They Support Your Business and its End-Users

Albeit the challenge in doing so, IT departments must start to view themselves as providers of business services and not just the supporters of applications, servers, networks and storage arrays. While the latter is true, business users and customers are generally not concerned about the details of making technology work, but rather they are concerned about whether an agreed-upon service is available or meeting their expectations. Understanding a new or existing service’s utility (what a service does) and its warranty (how well it does it) will help ensure that the service meets the requirements of the business. With that knowledge you should be best positioned to document repeatable and integrated processes for managing your services and operations.

Tip Six: Structure Your Support Organization into Integrated Teams versus Isolated Support Silos

In many IT organizations, day to day support is provided and managed by technology groups such as Windows Support and Unix Support. Most often these independent support silos operate independently with a myopic focus on technology outcomes such as server uptime. However siloed organization and behavior makes it much more difficult to reach business goals or targets due to alignment with IT-focused Operational Level Agreements rather than business-focused Service Level Agreements. This leads to less-efficient use of staff resources and poor interdepartmental communication.

Best results are often achieved when companies break down isolated support silos and work to create integrated support teams. Integrated support teams collaborate to support a service end-to-end, from desktop (or user!) to server, and focus on achieving business outcomes.

Tip Seven: Establish Service-based versus Operational Metrics

Don’t expect what you don’t inspect, and when you inspect, ensure you are measuring what really matters. A formal reporting and measurement program is a key component to quickly identify areas for improvement. The trick here is not to get bogged down at the lowest level of a reporting strategy by only viewing operational metrics. A good reporting strategy should include operational metrics, key performance indicators and critical success factors which encompass an end-to-end service operation. This effort can be further expanded by introducing a sound Continual Service Improvement process. By doing so your organization's ITSM measurement and reporting activities will provide the basis for identifying and prioritizing IT service improvements.

Summary

To assist with guiding your IT service transformation’s passage through the rough waters of implementation, these seven tips can help ensure that you not only get off to the right start, but can ease the concern of how to get there. This approach leverages the integration of services, process, people, and tools which leads to infinite synergy. By understanding this and executing on these tips, you can calm and navigate the waters of IT service transformation without drowning.

Mr. Likier is an ITIL V3 Expert certified consultant within Forsythe's IT Service Management Professional Services Group. Most recently, he has been responsible for the delivery of IT Service Management best practices which provide value to customers in a wide range of vertical markets. His experience encompasses ITSM, ITIL, and process design/implementation and project management.

Understanding and Maximizing Your ITSM Investment

May 22, 2009
By David Mainville

It’s more than a matter of faith, writes ITSMWatch guest columnist David Mainville of Consulting-Portal.

Throughout my 29 years of service management experience I never once doubted the value of having well defined and well implemented IT processes. Over time, it became part of my belief system. I had faith that IT service management (ITSM) provided real value to an organization even though that faith was sometimes hard to explain to others.

However, just because I had faith in ITSM, it didn’t stop senior management from asking “What’s the ROI?” That got me to thinking about my own experiences with ITSM. As a young field engineer fixing mainframes I was on the front lines of incident management.

No one ever argued about the value of getting a client back online quickly.

As a service support manager I learned to look at trends and, in one specific situation, our team identified the root cause of a serious problem. By implementing a simple low-cost engineering fix, we were able to save the company millions of dollars in component replacements, employee overtime and, not to mention, customer goodwill.

No one ever doubted the value of saving money.

As an owner of an ITSM consulting firm, I count on having well defined processes, supported by metrics and continual service improvement, to grow my business. I’m happy to say that my investment in processes has paid off and we are celebrating 10 years in business. So, why do people still question the value of ITSM? I believe it’s because people confuse “adopting a framework” with the hard work of “managing the details”.

Going back to my earlier examples, the true value comes from working the processes. Take incident management as an example. The only way you benefit from an incident management system is if it helps you resolve incidents quicker, reduces the cost of an incident or helps you avoid incidents altogether.

In order to realize maximum benefits from incident management, system data needs to be captured, analysis must be performed and improvements must be identified and implemented. Getting to those improvements is where both the value and the hard work lie. Unfortunately, far too many organizations have gone down the path of writing process documents that sit on the shelf or jump from one ITSM tool to another because they never get the implementation right. Thus, when they fail to derive value from ITSM, the blame is placed on “a faulty framework” and never on the lack of execution.

When people question their faith in ITSM they need to remind themselves that it’s easy to define a process or buy a tool. What always tends to be missing is the willingness, governance and the hard work required to get the value. It is my unfortunate experience that many IT organizations have lost sight of what ITSM is all about. ITSM is not a fad, it’s not a “nice to have” and it’s surely not something from which to calculate ROI. ITSM should be at the core of every IT organization. Ask yourself the question: Why do IT organizations exist? I believe it’s for one reason: to service the business. So, why is there so much dissatisfaction with IT organizations?

Back in 2005 Nicholas Carr, in his bestselling book, asked the question “Does IT matter?” Is the trillions of dollars invested annually into corporate IT actually providing a competitive advantage? That book set off a firestorm of debate, a debate that was held over the backdrop of outsourcing, off-shoring and “on-demand” services.

I believe the reason that argument resonated with so many people is there was already serious doubt about whether IT provided any real value to an organization. All one had to do was follow the endless stream of outsourcing announcements to see there was obviously a powerful chord of dissatisfaction with IT. You may disagree and argue that outsourcing was driven purely by the bottom line. However, it’s been my experience that organizations flirt with outsourcing when the business is dissatisfied and feels that IT is being non-responsive and un-supportive. Outsourcing starts with dissatisfaction and is justified by dollars.

Whether we like it or not the latest generations of business users are computer savvy and used to getting things on-demand. These folks, brought up on YouTube, FaceBook and Google have much higher expectations. So, when IT says it will take months to provision a service or make a change to an application they are tempted to go out on the Internet and find something they can use right away.

We can shrug and say "The business just doesn’t get it―they don’t understand the complexity we have to deal with,” or we can use the discipline of ITSM to find ways to better communicate with the business, improve cycle-times and reduce cost. When we lose sight of the SERVICE in ITSM we are just putting our companies, our co-workers and our own livelihoods at risk.

Nuts and Bolts

So, how does an organization go about maximizing its investment in ITSM?

Realize that ITSM is not something new, but it’s something you already do. The important thing is taking what you do and making it better. In order to accomplish that you need to understand your services, you need to track your performance and you need to take corrective action.

Don’t waste your time trying to justify ITSM―that’s like justifying breathing. Take it on faith that the discipline of ITSM is a given. Focus on communicating with your clients, on having clear and measurable services, on making your supporting processes actionable and on making your people accountable.

Get everyone on the bus and point that bus in a single direction. You can’t have your organization driving different ways to get to the same point. Agree on a plan for improving services, implement processes to support the services and measure the outcomes. Don’t be afraid to tell someone they need to get on a different bus. For that you need leadership.

Educate and automate. Communicate the value of improving services, communicate how the processes will provide value and automate the processes wherever possible so that people are guided through the steps. Leave nothing to chance.

Lastly, don’t fall into the trap that a tool will solve all your problems. There are no silver bullets. The value will come from developing a culture of service and the discipline of measurement and continual service improvement.

I’ll wrap up this article by asking you to do one thing for me: look at your own personal experiences and think of a service provider that consistently provides you with an outstanding service experience. Now think of one who provides the opposite. The difference between organization A and B is the degree to which they practice the discipline of ITSM. Now which organization do you want to be?

David Mainville is CEO and co-founder of Consulting-Portal, an ITSM consulting and ITIL training company focused on helping Fortune 500 and mid-size companies assess, design and implement robust IT Service Management processes. Consulting-Portal also offers a full curriculum of ITSM education including: ITIL, ISO and CobiT.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

ITIL/ITSM Governance Lacking

March 13, 2009
By ITSM Watch Staff

Survey finds most organizations do not define, implement or enforce ITSM governance.

Without formal IT governance, results are not measurable and IT is not aligned with the business. In its 4th annual IT Service Management (ITSM) Industry Survey, Consulting-Portal, an ITSM consulting firm, found that regulatory compliance (e.g. Sarbanes Oxley) is driving the requirement for IT controls. As a result, most organizations have adopted ITSM as the underpinning framework for meeting regulatory requirements. However, it is disconcerting that as little as 29% of surveyed organizations have defined implemented and enforced ITSM governance.

Failure to govern IT processes can cause an IT operation to lose focus resulting in lost productivity, diminished reputation and reduced revenue. A focus on governance results in a stable and consistent IT service delivery.

Some additional findings from this year's survey:

  • Only 24% of respondents have actionable metrics that are used for continuous improvement.

  • Only 38% of respondents have implemented a configuration management database (CMDB).

  • 71% of respondents do not have defined, implemented and enforced ITSM governance.

Methodology

The ITSM survey contained 35 questions covering the topics of sponsorship, training, organization and governance, best practices, measurement and audit, continuous improvement and supporting tools. This year Consulting-Portal obtained 183 responses to the survey from medium-sized to fortune 500 companies from various industries. For a copy of the survey results white paper please visit: http://www.cportalinc.com/downloads.php.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Defending ITIL’s Value

March 20, 2009
By George Spafford

ITIL is on the verge of being labeled a fad due to great promises and few returns, writes ITSMWatch columnist George Spafford of Pepperweed Consulting.

We should be able to read about all sorts of success stories with metrics yet most articles are about promise, theory, and application. Why is this? Why aren’t there more reports of success and why are both IT and business leaders starting to become jaded when it comes to the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL)? Part of the problem is in how ITIL is viewed and how it is implemented.

ITIL isn’t simply about a collection of processes listed in books. It’s about IT service management (ITSM) and the belief that IT must deliver services to the business that meet requirements. In a sense, IT is playing catch-up with manufacturing. Following WWII, the Japanese were quick to embrace quality management led by the likes of Deming and Ishikawa. In the 1980s, U.S. manufacturing realized they needed to fundamentally change how they conducted business in order to compete with the Japanese. Now, it is IT's turn. This means that not only IT but the business also must change how IT is wielded in order to successfully enable IT’s mission of value creation and protection.

Goals and Objectives

Functionally, IT is a shared service that provides IT related services to other business units to help those groups attain their objectives. IT doesn’t do these things on their own – or at least they shouldn’t. That is how alignment problems come into existence. For example, IT helps generate revenue by enabling sales, not by circumventing them. IT helps lower costs by empowering manufacturing and procurement through services that enhance productivity while simultaneously mitigating risks.

The point is that IT plays a supporting role as force magnifier to other business units.

To do this, the strategic direction of the business and service requirements must be understood, documented, and agreed upon. New and/or changed business and IT services must then be designed, transitioned into production, maintained and supported in operations and all the while IT and business must pursue continuous service improvement.

While creating and supporting IT services it is important to understand that ITIL’s ultimate value does not lie in isolated processes. The value lies in the ITSM philosophy and the creation and protection of value around objectives that support the goals of the organization. IT organizations that say they are using ITIL to design and operate the service desk and incident management are only scratching the surface of what could be done.

Processes and functions performed in isolation without an overarching ITSM process to coordinate activities will rapidly encounter diminishing returns because there are limits to the benefits they can achieve. For example, incident management doesn’t fundamentally improve the services IT is providing to enable the business, it only helps streamline the reaction to deviations, or potential deviations, from standard operation of the service. To truly improve the service requires the coordinated use of multiple processes.

Without formal IT governance, results are not measurable and IT is not aligned with the business. In its 4th annual IT Service Management (ITSM) Industry Survey, Consulting-Portal, an ITSM consulting firm, found that regulatory compliance (e.g. Sarbanes Oxley) is driving the requirement for IT controls. As a result, most organizations have adopted ITSM as the underpinning framework for meeting regulatory requirements. However, it is disconcerting that as little as 29% of surveyed organizations have defined implemented and enforced ITSM governance.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Developing Actionable ITIL Processes

March 5, 2009 By Mike Tainter and Kristy Smith

A sound framework coupled with cultural transformation and results tracking are essential for successfully implementing ITIL, write ITSMWatch columnists Micheal Tainter and Kristy Smith of Forsythe.

Effective adoption of ITIL requires not only the application of ITIL best practices, but also a sound process development framework. Coupled with a campaign of cultural transformation and consistent measurement and results tracking, solid process development techniques will yield repeatable, integrated and actionable processes for managing services and operations across the IT organization.

The Pitfalls of Haphazardness

Haphazard processes can perpetuate inefficiencies, if not chaos, in an IT organization. For example, the complete set of knowledge of an IT organization's activities is usually spread among its many employees. This applies to process documentation, which is too often located in disparate repositories—such as hard drives, shared drives, email folders and people's memories—and is typically stored in many formats such as Word, Visio, PowerPoint, or not documented at all.

Thus, critical process intelligence can be lost or get out of sync when staff members leave, or when the organization grows, restructures or merges. The result is haphazard process development. Haphazard processes may have no clear entry or exit point, too much (or too little) detail, crossing lines, wordy or ambiguous procedure names, undefined roles and ownership, and a lack of clearly defined inputs and outputs to and from other processes.

Figure 1. Haphazard process development

A Sound Framework

A sound process development framework to support development of actionable ITIL v3 processes brings many benefits: centralized knowledge capture, repeatable results, reduced defects, increased collaboration, and a shared process language across the organization. It facilitates continual process improvement, and provides a consistent baseline for measurements, results tracking, and change control.

A good process development framework comprises an online tool built around a multi-layered process model. As depicted in Figure 2, each layer of the model parses the process into progressively lower levels of detail, leading the end user in an intuitive fashion to the specific actions required for thorough ITIL process implementation.

Figure 2. Multi-layered process framework

The four layers of the process framework are: process, procedures, steps, and work instructions and tool tips. Processes, procedures, steps and work instructions are housed within the online tool. The highest and lowest layers, policies and work flows physically reside outside of the online tool, but are still an integral part of an actionable process model. Each layer of an actionable process model is described in detail below.

Policies - A policy is a high-level overall plan that covers general objectives and expectations. For example, a common policy for Incident Management is to use the service desk as a single point of contact for all incidents, while common policies for change management are to establish a change advisory board (CAB) and to define rules for executing different types of changes such as emergency, standard, normal, etc.

Policy development is a responsibility and activity of management. It occurs outside of the process framework, and provides the goal posts toward which all process development is aimed.

Processes - Processes are high-level activities required to meet the policies and objectives of the organization during various phases of the IT service management lifecycle. The major activities for each process can be derived from the various books in the ITIL v3 service lifecycle. This is where it all starts and where ITIL paves the way.

Procedures - Each process should also outline the procedures that establish the set of steps required to complete the process activities. For example, the Incident Management process would have a set of procedures to identify and log; categorize and prioritize; investigate and diagnose; resolve and recover; monitor, track and communicate; and close the incident. Procedures are repeatable and static regardless of the particular incident or change request involved. A procedure is an action—its name always begins with a verb. Every procedure is triggered by a specific event or input, and results in a specific output.

Steps - Each procedure comprises a set of steps, arranged in flowchart fashion, that are followed to complete the procedure. For example, Incident Management contains a procedure to categorize and prioritize the incident. To complete this procedure, you would complete the following steps: determine the request type, record the incident details, identify the impacted configuration item, and determine the priority of the incident.

Work Instructions - Each step contains work instructions which document repeatable, role-based instructions for completing the step. Work instructions are where the processes and procedures meet the IT service management tool; as they explain how to utilize the tool to execute the step, when applicable.

To continue our example above, the work instruction for the step determine the priority of the incident would contain specific information about impact and urgency levels and criteria, and would describe how to indicate the incident's priority within the tool.

Work Flows - The lowest level of detail is the work flow. Work flows are repeatable, role-based instructions for executing a change, fixing a problem or producing a work product. Work flows are dynamic, consisting of the details tailored for each task that IT performs for the business. Documented work flows often reside in the IT service management tool in a pre-populated model or template, and are also referred to as standard operating procedures (SOP).

An example of a work flow is an incident resolution template, an automated service desk template that pre-populates an incident record with appropriate instructions for resolving a recurring incident. Other examples of work flows are standard change; a prescribed set of instructions for building, testing and implementing a repeatable change such as a password reset or a new employee setup; and a test script, a specific test scenario for confirming automated functionality.

Fostering Actionable Processes

Ensuring that ITIL processes are actionable is a challenge that goes beyond process development and documentation. The organization must recognize that a cultural transformation is required to foster acceptance of ITIL and to anchor new behaviors. In addition, a measurement strategy must be employed to track results of the ITIL implementation, to determine levels of adoption, and to promote continual improvement.

An ITIL initiative, like any change initiative, can potentially fall victim to the "dead salmon" syndrome: salmon swim upstream against the flow, lay their eggs and, ultimately, end up dead in the water. An ITIL initiative that is constantly swimming upstream against the cultural flow will likely meet a similar fate.

In his book Leading Change, John Kotter discusses an "eight stage process of creating major change" to effectively lead an organization through cultural transformation. The eight stages are:

  1. Establishing a sense of urgency
  2. Creating the guiding coalition

  3. Developing a vision and strategy

  4. Communicating the change vision

  5. Empowering broad-based action

  6. Generating short-term wins

  7. Consolidating gains and producing more change

  8. Anchoring new approaches in the culture

According to Kotter, stages 1 through 4 of the transformation process help break the status quo. Stages 5 to 7 introduce new practices. And stage 8 grounds the changes in the culture to help them stick.

The pressure to produce quick results often leads to a desire to skip stages or to execute them out of order. Don't be a dead salmon. It is important that all eight stages are followed sequentially. To curtail the desire of individuals to work against the impending change, and to actually nurture enthusiastic support, follow best practices for creating successful change before going down the road of ITIL implementation. Establish a steering committee, form a good foundation of management support, and communicate the vision before proceeding to introduce process and procedural change to the organization.

Change Through Measurement

An essential part of any ITIL implementation is to monitor technical and business results—such as process performance, quality, customer satisfaction, and levels of compliance—utilizing rationalized metrics, reports and auditing. Determine and baseline a set of critical success factors (CSF) with supporting key performance indicators (KPI) and operating metrics (OM). Determine a reporting strategy and schedule. These will be utilized by the steering committee, process owners and managers to measure process conformance, quality and performance.

Keep in mind that it is not reasonable to expect that process will be followed without proper inspection for conformance and performance. You can't expect what you don’t inspect.

Just as important is to measure cultural adoption of ITIL by surveying and interviewing IT staff to learn their attitudes. Are they realizing practical benefits as a result of the ITIL initiative, and does it seem worth the effort so far? Do they have an idea to contribute, or do they want clarification of an issue? This is crucial to making processes actionable and to ensure continual process improvement.

Mike Tainter, Forsythe’s ITSM practice director, has been managing technology and large-scale IT projects for more than 20 years, including IT service management, ITIL,operations management, process design, IT operations support system development, and IT logistical requirements. Tainter holds the Foundation Certificate in IT Service Management and the Manager's Certificate in IT Service Management.

Kristy Smith, ITSM associate consultant at Forsythe, has an extensive background in accounting as well as more than 10 years of IT experience including experience managing IT service management and ITIL implementations and developing ITSM methodologies. Smith holds the Foundation Certificate in IT Service Management.

Friday, February 20, 2009

ITIL v3 is Your Next Step in ITSM

February 20, 2009
By Eddy Peters

ITIL v3 changes enable service-driven processes instead of process-driven services, writes ITSMWatch guest columnist Eddy Peters of CTG.

Most of us still remember June 2007, when the long-awaited ITIL v3 was released. This version would present an integrated approach to service management by covering all aspects of the service life cycle—from cradle to grave and everything in between. The journey was documented in five books called the "core volumes".

On launch day, the itSMF presented the ITIL v3 “roadshow," a document, which to this day provides quality information. The roadshow includes a complete overview of ITIL v3 and answers to questions like Why the need for change? and What is the purpose of ITIL v3? The future looked promising!

To better understand the capabilities of v3, we devoured the core volumes and then carefully evaluated them against the purpose and changes identified in the roadshow presentation. This exercise resulted in the following dashboard, which shows how well the core volumes deliver on itSMF’s promises:


Fig. 1 - Study summary covering all volumes

Early on, we saw that v3 didn’t quite meet expectations. The lack of more practical “how to” guidance was a bit of a surprise. Luckily, itSMF foresaw complementary publications, which would provide more guidance and understanding. But since the complementary material is still in development, we’ve been digging even deeper into the hidden opportunities in the core volumes’ 1,344 pages. Although there have been many informative sessions about v3, the potential is still not fully clear.

So, if you're asking yourself "is v3 your next step in IT service management?" You’ll be relieved to hear that ITIL v2 is still alive and kicking. In fact, v2 is here to stay; alongside v3. Why? Because it’s concise and focused on day-to-day management of existing IT services. Compared to v3, it is a useful "pocket guide" consisting of just two books and 686 pages. So, you can continue to use your existing v2 processes. However, v3 introduces some interesting ideas to further mature your daily activities. Some gems which are worth looking into:

  • Request fulfillment: the explanation that was missing in v2 Service Request

  • Event management (completely new): guidance for integrating warnings from monitoring tools into support activities.

Among others, these processes round out ITIL’s guidance for optimizing your daily operations. What else is in v3?

Process-Driven Services

ITIL v3 covers much more ground, from development to testing to facilities to operations. New processes like Service Catalog Management can increase awareness of what services are delivered. Service Asset and Configuration Management provide an approach to dealing with service management information. These actions will help build an improved, more mature, process-driven IT organization. This is good, but it could be better.

The full potential of v3 cannot be realized by focusing solely on process implementations or improvements—that’s just ITIL v2.5. The emphasis on processes leads to a new phenomenon: process silos. These are similar to the functional silos we all know so well, which each compete for a share of the budget. Implemented processes provide great benefits to the IT organization (streamlined activities, improved capabilities of specific IT groups, optimal resource usage, to name a few). But these improvements don’t necessarily roll up to the rest of the business. Why not? Because they’re mostly still focused inward; on IT.

Service-Driven Processes

ITIL v3 provides the next step in service management: think service, think life cycle. Service management in the IT organization is no longer driven by processes, but by the elements ITIL was created for in the first place—services.

As the creation of a service moves from business analyst to development to testing to operation, v3 provides an opportunity to align different departments within the IT organization. At that point, service silos are created, competing for a part of the budget. As an interesting side effect, services are outward focused, to the business. If the business derives value, the provided service is funded; if not, it gets retired. That’s what integration is all about.

Even with a few gray areas, ITIL should definitely have a place in the IT organization’s strategy to take the service delivery maturity forward. When optimizing processes, both v2 and v3 add value. When attempting to work out a service-oriented life cycle approach, v3 is there for you. When it comes to answering the question, “Is ITIL version 3 my next step in IT service management?”, it is not so much about If, but how you will do it.

Going for process-driven services (ITIL version 2 & 2.5) or service-driven processes (v3), it all comes down to what your organization wants to achieve, what its maturity level is in delivering service and what its capabilities are to cope with change. The choice is yours.

Eddy Peters is a senior ITSM consultant with CTG, an international IT company with headquarters in Buffalo, N.Y. Mr. Peters has been active in IT for almost 20 years, acquiring experience in both support and delivery capabilities. He had the opportunity to dig into the ITIL v3 framework early on as a beta reviewer, and to understand its potential. With the official release of the core volumes, he became the driving force within CTG to assimilate the knowledge and put it into a practical perspective.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Research Indicates Continued ITSM Growth in 2009

January 7, 2009
By ITSM Watch Staff

CIOs will advance ITSM programs to better align IT with business drivers.

Despite the unsteady economy, 87% of IT professionals are planning strategic, enterprise-level ITSM programs with the support of senior management. This is one of the key findings of a new Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) report: 2009 Trends and Best Practices Advice for ITSM Technologies and Processes.

"The coming year will certainly be a critical, pivotal year for IT executives,” said Chris Matney, EMA consulting director and study leader, in a press release. "Fiscal pragmatism will be weighed against the increasing challenges of IT, and IT leaders must carefully balance both. Successful CIOs will continue to advance ITSM maturity while closely watching business drivers and the corporate balance sheet.”

According to the survey, mid-size companies showed the highest levels of ITSM adoption. Smaller companies typically rely on traditional service/help desk implementations, while the largest enterprises continue to work through the challenges of complexity and scalability. Most companies are in a transition phase with their ITSM maturity, between an "active” and a "proactive” approach.

EMA believes that the most successful companies will push through the economic recession with IT advancements and investment, while unsuccessful organizations will adopt a more passive "business as usual” approach.

Additional key findings from the survey include:

- IT budgets are not in a total free-fall, but a growing number of IT organizations are cutting budgets by 10% to 25%.

- Change management was the most important ITSM initiative for companies of all sizes, followed by the other ITIL service support disciplines.

- Only three percent of respondents reported that all ITSM initiatives have been completed, and 80% said some have been finished.

- Most (74%) of respondents place primary responsibility for strategic ITSM planning on C-level executives, IT vice presidents and IT directors.

- Most (67%) of respondents are not planning to replace their ITSM tools. For those that are, functionality limitations are the primary drivers for mid-sized companies and lack of scalability is the motivation for enterprise organizations.

- ITIL is the biggest area of investment for advancing the adoption of ITSM best practices, with 62% of companies expecting to undertake training in 2009.

EMA believes short-term projects will gain favor in 2009 due to longer term budget uncertainties. Most ROI break-even expectations for ITSM projects are between six and 18 months. Some of the best practices recommended by survey respondents included creating an incremental ITSM plan and securing executive and business support early in the process.

Sign up here for the free Webinar on January 8 titled, "Make the Most of ITSM in 2009: Best-Practice Advice from Your Peers”

Methodology

For this report, EMA surveyed 143 IT professionals to uncover success factors and pitfalls of ITSM initiatives and recommended best practices based on real-world deployments.